1 100 2 https://cius-archives.ca/files/original/9281ce66555e9e9b54ab9b5424950287.pdf a0ba1127b7cf52d470184aac4126a330 Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource <h4>Books</h4> Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Pereiaslav 1654: A Historiographical Study Subject The topic of the resource Imperial Russia Cossack Administration XVII c. XVI c. History History of Ukraine Russia–Ukraine Description An account of the resource In 1954, the three-hundredth anniversary of the Pereiaslav Treaty of 1654 between Russia and Ukraine was celebrated with unprecedented fervor throughout the Soviet Union. The event was resurrected ostensibly to justify the position of Ukrainians within the Soviet Union as a “younger brother” of the Russian people. What actually happened at Pereiaslav? Did the Ukrainians accept the tsar as their sovereign? Or was it rather a treaty among equals, soon to be broken by the Russian side? The issues have been obscured by ideology, partial reporting, and the absence of documentation. This volume includes a historical survey, excerpts from the Cossack chronicles, the conclusions and disputes of leading historians from the seventeenth to the present century, and a careful survey of Soviet historiography, with its changing emphases. The author’s analysis is detached and scholarly. He refuses to be drawn into political debates but instead focuses closely on the problematic issues: the documents controversy, the role of Bohdan Kmelnytsky, Buturlin’s refusal to take an oath guaranteeing traditional Cossack rights, and the status of Ukraine as decreed by the treaty. Pereiaslav 1654: A Historiographical Study is essential reading not only for scholars of Ukrainian and Russian history, but for all who wish to understand the historical roots of Ukraine’s relations with Russia. For a fundamental analysis of the Pereiaslav Treaty of 1654 see also Mykhailo Hrushevsky’s History of Ukraine-Rus’. Volume 9, book 2, part 1: The Cossack Age, 1654-1657. Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource John Basarab Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available CIUS Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1982 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource John Basarab Language A language of the resource Ukrainian 17th century Bohdan Khmelnytsky Cossack Chronicles Cossack Statehood Cossacks Crimean Tatars and Ukrainian Alliances John Basarab Khmelnytsky's Foreign Policy Pereiaslav Treaty Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth Decline Political Ideologies in Ukrainian History Russian Empire Formation Treaty of Pereiaslav Interpretation Tsarist Expansionism Ukraine Ukraine's Autonomy under Tsardom Ukrainian Cossack Revolution Ukrainian Intellectual History Ukrainian-Russian Relations Zaporozhian Army https://cius-archives.ca/files/original/2918ad4e5833c09e58ca046e65af815c.mp3 319a623e18f21674fc638fc51677e09c https://cius-archives.ca/files/original/7346f8f57df928152c026976e7983c96.mp3 cccc9b63ab601a3e83f5eba06144736c Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource CIUS Seminar Series Subject The topic of the resource History Art Ukraine's Historiography Canadian Institute of Ukrainian Studies Canadian History Description An account of the resource CIUS Seminars; lectures; visiting scholar lectures Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource CIUS Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived CIUS Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available CIUS Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1976–Present Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Leonid Plyushch, Jurij Borys, Andrij Makuch, Keith Spicer Language A language of the resource English, Ukrainian Type The nature or genre of the resource Lecture, discussion Sound A resource primarily intended to be heard. Examples include a music playback file format, an audio compact disc, and recorded speech or sounds. Original Format The type of object, such as painting, sculpture, paper, photo, and additional data Magnetic tape, audio cassette Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Russia and Ukraine: The Difference that Peter I Made Subject The topic of the resource History Russian Empire Politics Description An account of the resource CIUS Seminar Audio Part 1 and 2. Part 1 Audio begins at 3:35. In his presentation, "Russia and Ukraine: The Difference that Peter I Made," Dr. O. Subtelny, Associate Professor, Department of History, Hamilton College in Clinton, New York, argued that the state, as an institution, does not provide a useful framework for analyzing Ukrainian-Russian relations (or relations between Cossack Ukraine and Moscovite tsardom) prior to the period of Peter I for two reasons: (1) the two basic pillars of the early modern state - a standing army and a full-fledged bureaucracy - were non-existent in the Hetmanate, and only began to evolve in seventeenth century Muscovy; and (2) the basic functions of the absolutist state - coordination, coercion, and extraction of wealth - were inoperative in the tsars' relations with the Hetmanate. If the institutions of the state did not bind the two lands together, what did? The only other means by which two very different lands could be linked in early modern Europe was some form of vassalage. The Treaty of Pereiaslav established a modified form of vassal relationship between the Zaporozhian Host and the Muscovite tsar. The point of these modifications was that they allowed the tsar to preserve the forms of Muscovite autocracy (his refusal to swear an oath to his new subjects), while it gave the Ukrainians the terms which all vassals could expect of their new sovereign (non-interference in internal affairs, etc.). The significance of Peter I's innovations was that they abolished an essentially personal relationship between the Ukrainians and the tsar and created the institutions which could encompass both Ukrainians and Russians in one common state. It was no longer a common monarchy but a common state which linked Ukrainians and Russians: all the innovations which Peter I introduced in Ukraine fit neatly into the basic functions of statehood. Only after Peter I's changes were implemented did the tsar have the capacity to pursue coordinative, coercive, and extractive policies in Ukraine. Found in <a href="http://cius-archives.ca/items/show/1571">CIUS Newsletter Vol 3 Issue 1 (Winter 1978)</a> Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource CIUS Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available CIUS Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource October 30, 1978 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Orest Subtelny Language A language of the resource English, Ukrainian 17th century Bohdan Khmelnytsky CIUS Seminar Cossack State Hetmanate Orest Subtelny Pereiaslav Treaty Peter the Great Politics Russia Ukraine Ukrainian-Russian Relations